P and I cover versus hull running down clause (collision liability exclusion)
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Ingram Industries, Inc., 745 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1984)
Edition and licensing notes
Publisher. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi) (opinion text via law.resource.org)
Edition. 745 F.2d 995 (1984); retrieved 2026-09-29
Status. Judicial opinion of a United States court of appeals: a work of the U.S. government / government edict, public domain.
What this document is
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Ingram Industries, Inc., 745 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1984) - P and I cover versus hull running down clause (collision liability exclusion) is a reference published by U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi) (opinion text via law.resource.org). It is one of the documents that insurance license exam questions are written from. This page summarizes it and points to the official version, which is the text to rely on.
Questions about this source
More Federal sources sources
- Coverage for Pre-existing Conditions (Affordable Care Act) - HealthCare.govFederal guidance
- 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 -- Evaluation of Disability in General (the five-step sequential evaluation process)Regulation
- Parts of Medicare (Medicare & You / medicare.gov)Federal guidance
- Continuation of Health Coverage (COBRA) - U.S. Department of LaborReference
- Portability of Health Coverage (HIPAA) - U.S. Department of LaborReference
- Fair Credit Reporting Act - 15 U.S.C. § 1681a (Definitions)State statute
- 15 U.S.C. s. 1681b: FCRA permissible purposes of consumer reportsState statute
- 15 U.S.C. s. 1681c: FCRA requirements relating to obsolete information in consumer reportsState statute